Original Summary

Spent the week on a screen nobody asked for: a single page listing every strategy running on the account, sorted by profit and loss, with a verdict badge on each one. The honest result is that it makes the project look smaller than a marketing page would. 70 strategies running, and the grader attaches a LIVE verdict to exactly one of them. One SHADOW, one SHELF, and 67 with no grade at all because they have not traded enough for a verdict to be worth anything. A good number of the cards say "no promise" in plain text. Scrolling it is the actual experience. The first screen is all big green numbers and tidy curves. Then you reach the ones up two dollars, and then a long run of ones that did nothing. That tail is the part I think is worth showing, and it is also the part every competitor crops out of their screenshots. It is paper money end to end, simulated fills at real quotes, so none of those numbers are anybody's returns. Two things I would like a second opinion on. Whether a verdict badge that says no on 67 of 70 cards reads as honest or as broken to someone seeing it cold. And whether sorting by profit and loss is the wrong default when most of the list is zeros.   submitted by   /u/QuanTradin [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据：内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/24 05:39:40