Original Summary

Disclosure: I am one of the founders of Cupify. Cupify is a ~4-minute relationship self-exploration quiz, not a clinical diagnosis. It maps four everyday patterns — how you choose, decide, warm up, and recharge — into 16 relationship types, with a separate compatibility feature based on two result IDs. I’m trying to avoid building another label machine that gives people a type and leaves them frozen on the next text. Three things I’d love blunt feedback on: 1. Does “four everyday patterns” land more clearly than attachment-style labels? 2. Is the first-session value obvious enough before asking someone to create an account? 3. What wording makes a relationship quiz feel useful without drifting into overclaim or pseudoscience? Happy to answer product and tradeoff questions in the comments.   submitted by   /u/Superb_Box_6220 [link]   [comments]

中文概览

中文标题： 我构建了一个4分钟关系人格测验，想获得直率反馈

披露：我是Cupify创始人之一。Cupify是一个约4分钟的关系自我探索测验，并非临床诊断。它把选择、决定、升温、充电四种日常模式映射为16种关系类型，并有基于两个结果ID的兼容性功能。作者想避免只给标签，征求三点直率反馈：四种日常模式是否比依恋风格标签更清晰；在要求注册前首次体验价值是否明显；哪些措辞能让关系测验有用又不夸大或伪科学。

  • 情报分类：综合情报
  • 分类依据：关系人格测验的产品反馈请求，不属于明确技术、职业、商业、开源等分类，归综合。
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/16 05:21:26