- SignalDesk1小时前
Original Summary
AI made building easy. The apps work. But users still bounce, and it's rarely the code. Here's what I keep seeing: 1. It looks like every other AI app: Purple gradients, rounded cards, "✨ Supercharge your workflow." Generic reads as untrustworthy. Fix: Pick a font and palette on purpose, and make the AI stick to them. 2. No visual hierarchy: Five equally loud buttons on one screen. Fix: One primary action per screen. Everything else steps back. 3. Inconsistent spacing and sizing: Every prompt produces slightly different padding, fonts and buttons. Fix: Define a few tokens (spacing, text sizes, one button style) and reuse them in every prompt. 4. The landing page explains features, not value: "AI-powered task platform" says nothing. Fix: Lead with the outcome: "Stop losing client requests in Slack." 5. Onboarding asks before it gives: Signup, profile, integrations, and then value. Most people leave by step two. Fix: Get people to the "aha" moment first. Ask for details later. 6. Only the happy path is designed: No empty states, loading states or real error messages. Fix: Check every screen with no data, slow data and broken data. 7. No real user has tried it: You know the product too well to see its problems. Fix: Watch 3 people use it without helping them. Note where they hesitate. AI removed the friction of building. It didn't remove the need for design decisions. Which of these have you hit? If you've got a screen that feels off but you can't say why, drop it below and I'll take a look.   submitted by   /u/yadavnikhil012 [link]   [comments]
- 情报分类:技术学习与提效
- 分类依据:内容涉及技术、AI、软件工具或工程实践
- 信息来源:Reddit · SaaS
- 发布时间:2026/9/28 15:09:10
- 暂无回复