Original Summary

I'm building SkillHarbour, an Australian career platform. The idea is to make career development one continuous loop instead of leaving people to connect separate course platforms, resumes and job boards themselves: Your goal -> Your skills -> Gap analysis -> Learning plan -> Courses completed -> Evidence -> Skill Passport -> Job matches -> back to your goal The part I'm testing is whether that loop feels practical or simply too broad. I'd especially value blunt feedback on four points: Which step would be useful enough for you to try first? What evidence would make a Skill Passport credible rather than another self-reported profile? Would job matches based on demonstrated skills be more useful than matches based mainly on job titles and keywords? Where in this loop would you expect people to lose interest or stop updating their information? I spent seven years in frontline disability care before moving into building AI tools. The motivation is practical: people often know the outcome they want, but not the next skill to build or the evidence an employer will trust. Disclosure: I'm building this. I'm looking for criticism of the idea and the workflow, not sign-ups.   submitted by   /u/Public_Knowledge_980 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：工作与职业机会
  • 分类依据：内容涉及招聘、求职或职业发展
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/24 15:52:00