- SignalDesk2小时前
Original Summary
Disclosure: I'm the builder of the product mentioned at the end of this post. One thing that keeps slowing me down as I add more provider integrations: every provider's webhooks are shaped completely differently - different field names, different nesting, different retry/signature schemes. Every new integration means writing one-off parsing code again, and it never quite generalizes to the next provider. Curious how others here have actually dealt with this at scale - do you maintain a per-provider parser library, pay for a third-party normalization service, or just accept the duplication as a one-time cost per integration and move on? For context, I ended up building a normalization layer for my own use (WorldWebhook - maps each provider's raw event into one canonical event type, then re-delivers it to your own endpoints, signed and retried on failure), but I'm genuinely interested in how other people here have approached this differently. https://worldwebhook.com   submitted by   /u/Skuti2 [link]   [comments]
- 情报分类:综合情报
- 分类依据:内容未命中明确的垂直分类规则,归入综合情报
- 信息来源:Reddit · SaaS
- 发布时间:2026/9/22 04:03:58
- 暂无回复