Original Summary

First SaaS, and I'd rather hear this now than in six months. It solves a boring problem. Every mobile app needs a privacy policy URL, a support page, and for Google Play an account deletion page before review passes. Add app-ads.txt if it runs ads. Normally that's a domain, a host and a static site, per app. Mine scans the repo, works out what the app actually collects and which SDKs are in it, drafts all five pages plus app-ads.txt, and hosts them on a subdomain. You review and publish. No domain, no server. The problem: the people this helps most are the ones shipping apps fast with AI, because that's where the compliance part becomes the bottleneck. But that's also the audience most likely to say "I'll just generate the pages myself and drop them on a free host." Which they can, in an afternoon. My assumption is they'd pay for the hosting and the upkeep, not the generation. Generating a privacy policy is easy. Having it still live a year later, app-ads.txt served correctly, and a deletion page that actually notifies you, is the part that quietly rots if you DIY it. But that might just be me arguing myself into the answer I want. Pricing: free tier is one app with everything a store requires, permanently, no card. Paid is $5/mo, mainly for a custom subdomain instead of a random one. $15/mo for people running a portfolio. I think that's fair and I'd like to be told otherwise. For context before anyone asks: it's live but early, no paying users yet, which is exactly why I'm asking now rather than after I've built six months of the wrong thing. Two things I can't answer from inside my own head: Is $5/mo too much for something a determined person replaces with a weekend, or so low it signals the thing is trivial? And is "people building apps with AI" a market that buys, or one that by definition prefers to build?   submitted by   /u/hasanaga123 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：服务器与云资源
  • 分类依据：内容涉及服务器、云资源或网络线路
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SaaS
  • 发布时间：2026/9/20 00:51:15