Original Summary

Hi — I’m Imri, founder of Fantasy Forge. I built it for a problem I kept hitting: I’d research a pile of player props, then still treat every “liked” leg as equal when I built the slip. Fantasy Forge is a research / comparison layer — paste or explore a shortlist, see ranks and combinations, then decide what deserves a closer look. Independent tool (not PrizePicks or Underdog; no account linking). Decision support, not picks or guarantees. Demo (seeded sample board, not live lines): In the no-signup Try Demo, a 14-prop sample ranks end-to-end. The bottom of that board is Trae Young under 9.5 assists — the UI shows Hit %, a unitless Edge score, and Matchup on the card. The useful part for me isn’t “Avoid = fade it.” It’s that a shortlist stops looking flat: you see which legs to investigate before you treat them as interchangeable. Site (Try Demo, no signup): https://fantasyforge.app One question for this community: looking at the sample ranking / demo, what’s the first thing that feels unclear or missing for a first-time user — the scores themselves, what to do after a low rank, or how to get from “interesting” to “I’d try this with my own props”? Happy to take blunt feedback on positioning, UX, or whether this belongs in SideProject at all.   submitted by   /u/BehindFantasyForge [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据：内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/15 21:48:33