Original Summary

Self-hosting instructions in the README.<p>Hosted version: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;coastmath.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;coastmath.com&#x2F;</a><p>iOS app: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;apps.apple.com&#x2F;app&#x2F;id6809539979">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;apps.apple.com&#x2F;app&#x2F;id6809539979</a><p>This post is partially inspired by this thread: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=50048344">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=50048344</a><p>`` &gt; Somewhere around 20M people (0.2%) see first-hand that large, complex projects that used to take them weeks&#x2F;months can now be completed by agents with a prompt.<p>&gt;&gt; No, they can&#x27;t, at least not any semblance of quality. The cases we&#x27;re seeing where this does kinda work is in ports and translation where all the rules are already documented in the best specification language possible with a way for the LLM to verify itself: code. We saw this close to a year ago now with Cloudflare and NextJS ``<p>This post mostly outlines how I am personally building with agents, as I am almost entirely hands-off.<p>Desired feature-set determined by having agents research existing products and feedback &#x2F; feature requests on FIRE subreddits.<p>Features built using Opus 5.5 (xhigh) &#x2F; Fable 5.1 (med&#x2F;high) as orchestrator and Opus-5-5 low&#x2F;medium as worker subagents.<p>Quality is attempted by running Opus-5-5 agents in a perpetual audit + fixer loop on the calculation &#x2F; compliance engine until no medium+ severity can be found. The origin of each rule &#x2F; logic must be backed up and documented in the codebase with a source.<p>Sonnet subagents run UX &#x2F; QA audit on iOS simulators within the Claude Code desktop app, and Opus agents resolve all medium+ sev issues; also run on a perpetual loop.<p>I have not manually tested or used the app(s) for more than 30 minutes. For UX quality, agents&#x27; screenshots + associated context are fed to a combination of GPT &#x2F; Gemini &#x2F; Claude agents until consensus is achieved on quality (7&#x2F;10+).<p>Early feedback from beta testers report extremely close results to Boldin &#x2F; Projection Lab. There is also a feature to import your data from Boldin and Projection Lab into CoastMath if you wish to compare the results yourself.<p>There is also a SimpleFIN integration, if you wish to pull in your own transaction data and see how your financial future changes based on your monthly spending habits (e.g. when I will get to retire if I spend like I did in June vs. July?).<p>I&#x27;m sure there are other features I don&#x27;t yet know about. Again, I&#x27;ve barely used the app.<p>Anyway, feel free to use &#x2F; roast &#x2F; steal. I don&#x27;t think that any moat can exist in this class of products in the future (where the rules are laws that are visible to everyone) and I don&#x27;t expect to turn a profit.<p>Estimated cost: maybe $2000 if done over the API? I did most of this using the $200 Max subscription.


  • 情报分类:服务器与云资源
  • 分类依据:内容涉及服务器、云资源或网络线路
  • 信息来源:Hacker News 新项目
  • 发布时间:2026/10/17 04:17:33