- SignalDesk1小时前
Original Summary
Proposal specification: <a href="https://x-ryl669.github.io/codepill/" rel="nofollow">https://x-ryl669.github.io/codepill/</a><p>I've got frustrated of selecting the right licenses in many of my projects, because of the subtle differences in all of them and the large incompatibilities while mixing them. Also, I often find that some part of a document should be more restricted that the rest (think of a documentation you want in public domain citing GPLv3 code, or a GPLv3 code citing restricted standard text). Also, this scheme should be able to merge both "textual" licenses with "artistic" licenses like CC.<p>Hence I'm proposing a new scheme that clearly specifies what "rights" you're reserving for what part of a document, media, opus, speech. It's composable, it's simple to use for both humans and machine, it allows to deny machine processing (under the jurisdictions that do protect citizens against those).<p>I'm asking for feedback for this idea, is there something that you'd like to protect that I've forgotten, or do you find it convenient to use and understand ?
- 情报分类：商业与市场研究
- 分类依据：内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
- 信息来源：Hacker News 新项目
- 发布时间：2026/10/14 21:24:33
- 暂无回复