Original Summary

We make a browser extension in a crowded category. There are several free extensions that do the same core thing, and at least one of them is very good and syncs across devices for free. Ours matches that for free too. Every hiding switch works with no account and no limits. So the question we can't settle is whether anyone pays for a Pro tier that adds "a few more things" on top of free options that already work. Ours adds schedules, a daily limit, blocklists and a parent lock, at $4.99/month or $39.99/year. Thinking about it as a buyer, not a founder: When a free alternative already does most of what you need, what actually tips you into paying? Is it one feature, or a feeling that someone is looking after the product? How many extra features does it take? Does a short list of three things you really want beat a long list of ten? Would you pay more for features that matter to someone else, like a parent lock for a child's computer, or only for ones you'd use yourself? Does a free tier that's good enough make you more likely to pay later, or does it just mean you never do?   submitted by   /u/No_Wishbone_2754 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：工作与职业机会
  • 分类依据：内容涉及招聘、求职或职业发展
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SaaS
  • 发布时间：2026/10/13 09:32:10