- SignalDesk2小时前
Original Summary
AI wrote the PR. You still have to review it. Here is how that looks with ReviewStage. AI wrote the PR. The review bot wrote ten comments. I'm now reviewing both. The bots got muted. The PRs still needed checking. So I built ReviewStage . Claude drafts findings privately from the real diff, on your own Claude plan. You check them, keep what matters, drop the rest, edit anything, then post one review as yourself. Nothing posts until you click. Approve is a separate click. The drafting agent has no GitHub credentials and cannot write to GitHub. Each finding includes: The file and relevant lines. What to check and why it matters. A Checked, Likely or Maybe label, with a reason. For serious findings, a second pass that tries to disprove them. A reading guide points to which hunks to read first. Works from your phone too. Swipe right to keep, left to drop. Dating app mechanics, but the red flags are in Python. Open source. MIT. Free for private repos. The diff goes to Anthropic through your own Claude Code. Your posted review goes to GitHub. npx reviewstage Site | GitHub Which bot comments make you reach for mute? How I built it: A few weeks with Claude Code, a Python server, React and Electron, shipped through npm. One prompt it runs on: "Pull the actual files and try to falsify your own theories before including them."   submitted by   /u/windy_sl [link]   [comments]
- 情报分类:技术学习与提效
- 分类依据:内容涉及技术、AI、软件工具或工程实践
- 信息来源:Reddit · SideProject
- 发布时间:2026/10/12 00:45:55
- 暂无回复