- SignalDesk2小时前
Original Summary
Hello everyone, We’re currently developing JustizPro and are looking for lawyers who’d like to try it out and give us honest feedback on what’s actually useful in their day-to-day work. Let’s get this out of the way right away: We’re developers, not lawyers. We’ve spent a lot of time studying the processes involved, but running a law firm or handling cases on a daily basis is, of course, a different matter entirely. That’s why we need feedback from people who do this for a living. Clients can describe their case and upload documents—including scans and photos—via an access point on the law firm’s website or a link. The AI will ask follow-up questions and request any missing documents. Through the client portal, they can later submit additional documents, track the status of their case, and send messages to the law firm. The submitted documents are sorted and summarized for the case file. Information can be verified against the original sources, and draft pleadings can be prepared from the case file. What we want to find out: Does this actually save you time if you have to review and revise everything afterward? We’d love to try this out with you using a sample file. We’re interested in seeing where something is miscategorized, where important information is missing, or where a draft requires so much rework that you’d have preferred to write it yourself. We’re also interested in whether the digital submission is easy for your clients to understand. Even a comment like “I wouldn’t use it this way” helps us—as long as you explain why. If anyone’s interested, feel free to leave a comment here. We’ll discuss beforehand how long and to what extent you’ll be testing it. And even if you’re not interested in the test: Have you tried using AI for case work yet? What helped you, and what ended up being more trouble than it was worth?   submitted by   /u/Aggravating_Sea4244 [link]   [comments]
- 情报分类:商业与市场研究
- 分类依据:内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
- 信息来源:Reddit · SideProject
- 发布时间:2026/10/9 18:30:57
- 暂无回复