Original Summary

hey everyone, i've been researching how engineering teams evaluate candidates, especially with resumes, take homes, and ai making traditional assessments harder to rely on. I built a small prototype around a different approach: Give the candidate a realistic engineering task → evaluate the implementation → change the requirement → see whether they can adapt without breaking existing behavior. The prototype currently captures things like: automated test results hidden validation code changes between stages candidate reasoning how the implementation handles a changed requirement I'm not looking to sell anything right now . I'm trying to find out whether this actually provides useful signal to people who hire engineers. If you're an Engineering Manager, hiring manager, CTO, technical recruiter, or someone involved in engineering hiring, I'd really appreciate your feedback. If you're willing to try the prototype or give me a honest feedback, comment below or DM me. I'm especially interested in hearing what you currently use to determine whether someone can actually perform the engineering work they claim they can.   submitted by   /u/Fantastic-Wave-9571 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：工作与职业机会
  • 分类依据：内容涉及招聘、求职或职业发展
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SaaS
  • 发布时间：2026/10/5 13:28:10