Original Summary

Creator disclosure: FeeFence is my project. I’m sharing it for feedback from people quoting small website projects. The problem it targets is simple: a fixed fee can look reasonable until “one more page” and extra revision rounds change the amount of work. A fictional example: a £1,000 project estimated at 25 hours is £40/hour before costs. Add 10 unpriced hours and it becomes about £28.57/hour. The fee hasn’t changed, but the workload has. A useful scope check before quoting: • Specify pages and deliverables, including who supplies the content. • Define what counts as a revision round and how many are included. • List exclusions such as copywriting, integrations or ongoing maintenance. • Record the price and schedule effect of additions before starting them. I made a free browser calculator for estimating a quote with direct expenses, time contingency and collection fees, plus a copyable 12-point scope checklist and guides. No signup is needed for the free resources. Try it: https://feefence.shop There is also an optional £19 one-time spreadsheet/template kit on the site. The free calculator and checklist can be used without buying it. It’s a focused resource, not a client-management platform or legal advice. Which part of a fixed-fee quote is hardest to make clear to a client: revisions, content responsibilities, or pricing changes? I’d like to use concrete feedback to improve it.   submitted by   /u/Miserable-Heron-9599 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：综合情报
  • 分类依据：内容未命中明确的垂直分类规则，归入综合情报
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/10/2 11:45:00