Original Summary

I&#x27;m not a computer science guy, but I had a play with Jev and found it impressive. It allowed me to offer non-technical researchers the ability to classify arbitrary things their participants enter, without prior training or classification, at near instant speed, and negligible cost. My users may find that very helpful in the qualitative research world.<p>I showed them an innocuous working example of how they could classify thousands of participant entries as &quot;mentioning Italian food&quot; whether it mentioned &quot;pasta&quot;, &quot;penne&quot;, &quot;rigatone&quot;, etc etc. Jev did this task with high confidence, and showed it could differentiate between the inverse, eg had very low confidence when I switch entry to mentioning &quot;hamburgers&quot;. I find that a very useful tool to pass on to non-technical colleagues.<p>But on HN, there are lots of much more qualified people saying Jev is a con, a step backwards, or bonkers that people are impressed. Will one of them tell me plainly what software was doing this prior to Jev, and the like? I don&#x27;t doubt it existed, but I never came across it. I&#x27;m interested to hear from people more expert than myself.<p>To be precise, software must be able to: - Classify thousands of entries with arbitrary themes or topics, even if entry doesn&#x27;t mention that theme or topic directly, with high enough confidence to be useful. - Do it with thousands of entries in 0-3seconds. - Do it at negligible cost, eg sub 0.1cents

  • 情报分类：商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据：内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源：Hacker News 新项目
  • 发布时间：2026/9/28 00:59:15