Original Summary

Ever notice ChatGPT just agrees with whatever you say? I kept getting "great idea!" when what I actually needed was someone to tell me my idea was bad. So I built DeepThinker. You enter a question, assemble a panel of AI models with assigned roles (Supporter, Critic, Neutral Analyst, Synthesizer), and they debate in structured rounds. A separate judge model scores each round and gives a verdict with its reasoning. You can inject evidence mid-debate (PubMed, news, web search) and run up to 5 rounds. It's model-agnostic — 460 models to choose from, so you can pit ChatGPT-5.2 against Claude as the critic, for example. Free to start with 500 credits, no credit card. There's a public demo with a full debate transcript so you can see it before signing up. Honestly looking for feedback here — do the judge verdicts feel fair? What roles would you add? Roast away. https://deepthinker-ai.vercel.app/   submitted by   /u/Educational-Quiet-96 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：技术学习与提效
  • 分类依据：内容涉及技术、AI、软件工具或工程实践
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/25 20:17:21