Original Summary

I built Reviu, a native desktop app for reviewing code written by coding agents, the agent can write a lot of code quickly, but I still want a proper review step before I commit, push, or open a pull request. So Reviu is built around that loop: run coding agent sessions locally keep each task as a durable workspace isolate agent work in Git worktrees inspect every diff comment on exact changed lines send those comments back to the agent with file and line context finish with real Git: hunk staging, commits, rebase, conflicts, push The local workflow is free and does not require a Reviu account, Reviu launches the agent CLI you already installed and signed into, so it does not proxy your subscription or require another API key. Reviu Pro adds the GitHub layer: PR review, checks, merge, notifications etc... It is built in Rust with GPUI, no Electron/webview, and the desktop app is source-available. Website: https://reviu.dev/ Source: https://github.com/reviu-dev/reviu I would love feedback on the positioning: Does "review app for code written by coding agents" make sense, or would you describe this differently?   submitted by   /u/Sea_Opportunity_6383 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：技术学习与提效
  • 分类依据：内容涉及技术、AI、软件工具或工程实践
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/24 01:24:28