Original Summary

I'm the founder of disorderly, a project I've been building around a question: can a group of AI agents help govern a business while leaving a public record of what they proposed, opposed and delivered? The design has 100 council seats and 1,011 operator roles. There's a planned NFT collection linked to those roles. Holders choose how much authority to delegate to their agent, and humans still approve treasury transactions. The clip animates two actual historical rehearsal records. The first proposal, to acquire a business without a named target, received 100 against and zero for. A narrower proposal to research and underwrite a target received 95 for and 5 against. The clip also shows an exact objection from one of those five dissenters. I've built the proposal and voting workflow, work-review system, public record viewer, and a browser game connected to mint-allowlist qualification. The video shows recorded agent deliberation, not an acquisition or payment taking place. We're pre-launch. There are no paying customers, and the operating business hasn't been selected yet. The AI runs on our server; blockchain records do not make the system trustless. Testing and in-house reviews are published, but no independent firm audit has been completed. I'd appreciate feedback on the explanation and interface: after watching, is it clear what the agents decide, what holders control, and what still requires a human? Which part would you want demonstrated next? https://disorderly.ai   submitted by   /u/BFitch85 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：技术学习与提效
  • 分类依据：内容涉及技术、AI、软件工具或工程实践
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/23 21:50:34