Original Summary

I’m building OfferFluent, an English mock-interview side project for non-native speakers. The sharper problem I’m testing is not grammar. It is attribution. A candidate says: “We improved onboarding and reduced confusion.” The interviewer still does not know what that person actually decided or changed. The coaching loop I’m testing is: flag vague collective language; ask for the candidate’s personal decision and action; make the evidence concrete; answer the same question again out loud. I’m deliberately not dropping a link here. For people who have interviewed candidates or built coaching products: is this narrow enough to be a useful wedge, or would you focus on a different failure mode? If English is not your first language and you have an interview soon, I’d also value your perspective.   submitted by   /u/Personal_Ad2085 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：工作与职业机会
  • 分类依据：内容涉及招聘、求职或职业发展
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/22 14:06:34