Original Summary

I built SeeSpect for a problem I kept seeing in website audits: a score and a long warning list, but no clear next page or evidence. It crawls a public site and checks SEO, performance, security, accessibility, content, mobile and indexability signals. Each result includes severity, the affected URL and the page evidence. The free plan supports two scans per day with up to five pages per scan. I’m looking for specific feedback rather than upvotes: which result would you question, which page evidence is missing, and what would make the report more useful in a client handoff? If the current subreddit rules permit a project link, the free audit is here: https://seespect.com/scan?utm\_source=reddit\_sideproject&utm\_medium=organic\_community&utm\_campaign=15\_minute\_audit . I run SeeSpect, so the link is a product reference, not an independent recommendation.   submitted by   /u/SeeSpect [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：综合情报
  • 分类依据：内容未命中明确的垂直分类规则，归入综合情报
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/19 19:09:09