Original Summary

I kept running into company enrichment results that looked precise but gave me no way to tell whether a field came from the company itself or from somebody else's estimate. So I built FirmSignalIQ around a simpler idea: start with a public company domain and return only what can be observed from the site, with source URLs and timestamps attached. A lookup can return homepage titles and descriptions, detected technology signatures, social links, pricing and careers pages, and changes observed over time. The history window is 90 days. I also tried to be honest about what it is not. It doesn't return employee counts, revenue, funding estimates, or personal contact lists. JavaScript-only or blocked sites can produce partial results, and technology confidence is a heuristic rather than a measured probability. The part I'm still trying to validate is whether that tradeoff is actually useful. If you build CRM or automation workflows, would you rather receive a smaller set of traceable website facts, or a broader enrichment record with less evidence? And which single field would make this worth calling from a workflow? The live API and limitations are here: https://firmsignaliq.strigsapi.com/pricing I'm the builder, and blunt feedback is welcome.   submitted by   /u/AdPsychological9854 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：工作与职业机会
  • 分类依据：内容涉及招聘、求职或职业发展
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/19 10:42:29