Original Summary

I’ve been working on Veyrnox, a mobile self-custody crypto wallet designed around a few problems I keep seeing with wallets: seed phrase phishing, blind approvals, recovery confusion, and pressure-based mistakes. The idea is to make self-custody safer without making the user manage a plain 12-word seed phrase in the normal app flow. A few things Veyrnox focuses on: - No seed phrase shown in the normal UI - Keys generated and used on-device - Recovery designed around Shamir-sharded backup - Plain-language checks before risky wallet actions - Coercion-resistance concepts like decoy/duress flows - Security-first UX for people who are not full-time crypto experts I’m looking for honest feedback on the positioning, onboarding, and whether the security model is easy enough to understand. Website: https://veyrnox.com Short demo: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dFwkCdQqwr8 Happy to take critical feedback, especially from people who have used hardware wallets, mobile wallets, or have strong views on recovery design.   submitted by   /u/veyrnox [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据：内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/17 13:53:37