- SignalDesk2 hr ago
Original Summary
先说一下我的账号情况:十月初注册,Outlook 邮箱,家宽注册,App’store 付款的 Pro。 昨天我的 Claude 被封号了,我大概能猜出来是因为我之前一直用的是 wsl 完美环境里面的 Claude Code,昨天实在受不了换成 Claude Desktop 了,然后用了几个小时就被封号了 今天早上收到邮件解封了,下面是我申诉的内容 I am an international university student and software developer residing long-term in Japan. My daily workflow relies on both Claude Web Chat and Claude Code. I use Claude Web Chat locally from my residence in Japan (via a Japanese residential ISP) for academic research, and I use Claude Code within my software engineering environments—including both my local Windows PC and my Microsoft Azure cloud virtual machines (VPS) located in Japan—for cloud-native development and maintaining ongoing commercial projects that I initiated before moving to Japan. 【中文翻译对照】 我是一名长期定居在日本的大学留学生与软件开发者。我的日常工作流高度依赖 Claude 网页端对话(Web Chat) 和 Claude Code。我在日本的住所(通过日本家庭宽带)使用网页端进行学术研究;同时在我的软件开发环境(包括我本地的 Windows 电脑以及我位于日本的微软 Azure 云服务器 VPS)中使用 Claude Code 进行云原生开发,并维护我来日本之前就已启动的商业项目。 On October 19, my account was abruptly suspended for allegedly violating the “Supported Countries Policy” without any warning or specific evidence (Ref: TS-xxxxxxxxx). This arbitrary ban has severely disrupted my development schedule and is completely unacceptable. I physically live in Japan, and all my infrastructure—including my local residential broadband and my Microsoft Azure cloud instances—is physically located entirely within Japan. How on earth could this possibly violate your regional policy? Since you provided zero transparency regarding what triggered this false flag on October 19, I can only question what your automated system misinterpreted: Cloud Development on Japan VPS: As a developer, I regularly run Claude Code on my Microsoft Azure VPS hosted in Japan. Did your automated algorithm blindly flag legitimate Japanese datacenter IPs as “suspicious location spoofing” simply because they belong to a cloud provider? Cross-Border Endpoint Testing: Because my ongoing legacy project serves the Chinese market, I occasionally use network proxies/VPNs to debug Chinese server endpoints. Did a brief split-tunneling routing overlap during server testing trigger an instant ban? OS Locale Profiling: Or is it simply because I am a Chinese international student in Japan using a Windows PC with a Chinese OS environment and Chinese project files? Using cloud VPS instances located in Japan, testing cross-border endpoints, and working in one’s native OS language are standard software engineering practices—not violations of your Supported Countries Policy. Penalizing a legitimate developer residing and operating entirely within Japan due to overzealous algorithmic false positives feels unfair and discriminatory. I demand a manual review of my account logs and the immediate restoration of my access. 【中文翻译对照】 10 月 19 日,我的账号在没有任何预警或具体证据的情况下,因涉嫌违反“支持地区政策”被突然封禁(编号:TS-xxxxxxx )。这种武断的封禁严重打乱了我的开发进度,完全令人无法接受.我本人实实在在地住在日本,并且我所有的网络基础设施——包括本地家庭宽带和微软 Azure 云实例——全部物理托管在日本境内。这到底怎么就违反你们的地区政策了? 既然你们对 10 月 19 日触发误封的原因毫无透明度,我只能质疑你们的自动风控系统到底误判了什么: 在日本 VPS 上的云开发: 作为一名开发者,我经常在我托管于日本的微软 Azure VPS 上运行 Claude Code。难道你们的算法仅仅因为 IP 属于云服务商,就盲目将合法的日本数据中心 IP 标记为“可疑的位置伪造”? 跨国接口测试: 由于我正在推进的历史项目面向中国市场,我偶尔需要使用网络代理/VPN 去调试位于中国的服务器接口。难道是在服务器测试期间短暂的分流规则重叠触发了瞬间封号? 操作系统语言特征针对: 又或者仅仅是因为我是一名在日本的中国留学生,使用了保留中文系统环境和中文项目文件的 Windows 电脑? 使用位于日本的云服务器实例、测试跨国服务接口以及使用母语操作系统,都是标准的软件工程实践,绝非违反“支持地区政策”。因为过度敏感的算法误报而处罚一个完全身处日本并合法操作的开发者,让人感到极不公正且带有歧视性。我要求人工复核我的账号日志,并立即恢复我的访问权限。 2 个帖子 - 2 位参与者 阅读完整话题
- 情报分类:服务器与云资源
- 分类依据:内容涉及服务器、云资源或网络线路
- 信息来源:服务器 / LINUX DO - 最新话题
- 发布时间:2026/10/20 08:07:27
- No replies yet