Original Summary

I&#x27;ve seen a few impressive demos of Typesafe&#x27;s new paradigm with System One models, and it seemed really clear to me that this was probably the direction the industry, especially for autonomous agents, was headed.<p>It&#x27;s been a while though, and the major providers still seem to rely on more powerful LLMs (System Two) for all tasks, regardless of complexity.<p>Similar to how chain of thought arose, I thought the System One&#x2F;System Two <i>Thinking Fast and Slow</i> model was one of those human structures that fit really well onto training neural nets, and I thought that this new paradigm could really change things.<p>That doesn&#x27;t seem to be the case so far though, and I&#x27;m kind of puzzled to why this hasn&#x27;t broken the industry open by now. Of course my predictions are not infallible, and one shouldn&#x27;t expect much accuracy or for progress to abide by rigid schedules, but nonetheless: how come Kahneman Computer Use models aren&#x27;t everywhere by now?

  • 情报分类：商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据：内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源：Hacker News 新项目
  • 发布时间：2026/10/18 23:41:29