Original Summary

I’m building Prismovia.com, a publishing platform that turns a question, opinion or controversial idea into a researched, shareable article. Each article includes: Key facts and links to supporting sources Left, center and right perspectives A separate AI assessment of the article’s evidence, source quality and balance Public comments that can also be shared No account or password required—email verification is used to reduce spam My current challenge is distribution. The site works, but I haven’t yet found a reliable way to persuade people to create articles or join the discussion. Here is what I have tried so far: Running a paid Facebook/Meta video advertisement Posting promotional videos and links on Facebook and YouTube Sharing individual Prismovia articles on social media Posting calls to action under relevant Facebook and Ground News discussions Posting about Prismovia in startup, SaaS and beta-testing Reddit communities Asking people directly to test the article generator Offering reciprocal backlinks to other founders Building Facebook branding and a dedicated Prismovia page Improving article sharing and adding copy-link buttons Adding a prominent “Create Your Own Article” call to action Working on search-engine optimization, metadata, canonical URLs, structured data, a sitemap and robots.txt Creating About, Methodology and Editorial Policy pages to improve trust Separating satire/fiction from real articles Adding source verification and visible AI assessments so the content is more than unverified AI output Considering paying an outreach assistant based on genuinely new, email-verified article creators rather than clicks or comments There have been a few measurable successes: My SEO audit improved from 77/100 to 89/100. The same audit’s AI-visibility score improved from 88/100 to 91/100. Google is now indexing the site, and I have started receiving some Google clicks. My Reddit posts are appearing in Google search results. I have received some useful Reddit feedback, including interest in whether people will genuinely engage with opposing viewpoints. A few articles have attracted one or two comments, but most still receive none. The site now contains multiple articles with five checked source links and AI assessment scores around 88–94/100. What has not worked well: Facebook advertising produced visibility but very little visible engagement—few reactions, comments or followers. Social posts generate very few article creators. Most visitors appear to read or leave without creating an article or commenting. I still don’t have enough data to claim product-market fit, repeat usage or a predictable conversion rate. My first meaningful target is 100 people who each create at least one article using a new, verified email address. I only want to count actual verified creators—not clicks, bots, comments or repeat articles from the same person. If you were marketing this with a limited budget, what would you try next? Would you concentrate on one

  • 情报分类：服务器与云资源
  • 分类依据：内容涉及服务器、云资源或网络线路
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/14 21:30:30