Original Summary

https://preview.redd.it/fz9uf8i801wh1.png?width=2902&format=png&auto=webp&s=a33b81b80300d5ca98e95921161712b02623eb88 Every coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Kimi, Gemini CLI…) has the same two problems: Its training data stops at a cutoff, so it confidently uses APIs that were renamed or removed since. There are thousands of skills and MCP servers out there, and figuring out which ones are worth adding (and which ones are safe) is a research project of its own. CodexGuild reads your project's dependencies (names and versions only, never your code) and gives your agent: what changed in your stack since its training cutoff (releases, breaking changes, removed APIs) skills and MCP servers that fit your project, all security-scanned before they're recommended known fixes when it hits an error, and a check against hallucinated or malicious packages before it installs anything It plugs in as an MCP server, and setup takes a couple of minutes. Does it actually help? We measured it: same agent (Claude Code + Sonnet), same 20 real tasks, two rounds, no web access for anyone. Tasks solved: 38% → 83% on the free tier Tasks about changes newer than the model's training: 5/26 → 25/26 Cost per solved task: $0.112 → $0.071 (~37% cheaper) Methodology and per-task results: https://codexguild.com/docs/benchmark Free tier, no card: https://codexguild.com I'd really like feedback, especially on which harness you use and what your agent keeps getting wrong.   submitted by   /u/lemamali12 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据：内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SaaS
  • 发布时间：2026/10/17 21:03:44