Original Summary

Hi, I'm Alessandra. I'm Italian, I live in Barcelona, and I'm not a developer: I spent years in HR and payroll, where one wrong number on a payslip is a real problem for a real person. I think that's where my obsession with checking things comes from. The idea came from an ordinary frustration: I kept struggling to find out whether things I saw online were actually true. Once I spent days convinced a story was fake, because I couldn't find it at the source and some outlets were calling it fake news. It turned out to be real. That's when I realised the problem isn't only false things spreading. Checking is so hard that true things get dismissed too, and "I can't confirm this yet" is a very different answer from "this is false". So I started building Newsqora, an Android app for the moment you see something online and think "wait, is that true?". You paste a claim, a link or a screenshot, and in about a minute you get one of four graded answers (Likely accurate · Needs context · Inaccurate · Unverified) plus every source it read, each with author, outlet, date and link. Never a flat true or false. It's an AI and it can be wrong, so every answer says so and shows you the sources to open yourself. The closed beta with 12 testers is done, most of them between their 40s and 60s, which surprised me. Now I'm opening a free beta with 100 seats, because it's just me and I want to answer every piece of feedback myself. Two questions I'd love honest answers to: Would a graded answer make you trust a tool like this more or less than a simple true/false? What would make you stop trusting it immediately? Waitlist if you want a seat: newsqora.com/beta   submitted by   /u/Monkey3173 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据：内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/10/17 03:37:02