Original Summary

I've been working with a couple of my buddies at an outsourcing company for quite some time. We all have our own company-provided Claude subscriptions, and one of the hardest parts now is dividing up the work without stepping on each other's toes. We kept losing time splitting features into pieces each of us could build separately, then connecting everything later. So I built Claude Share to automate more of that coordination. We join a shared session with our Claude Code agents, split a ticket into tasks, and work in parallel from our own checkouts. Shared contracts define the interfaces, file leases help keep agents within their assigned files, and a live board shows who is building what. Each developer keeps their own Claude account and quota. The lesson for us has been that faster coding still needs clear task boundaries and a shared plan. Passing each task's checks also doesn't prove that the pieces work together, so the workflow includes checking the assembled app before the final integration PR. The plugin and self-hosted server are free and open source (MIT). Optional cloud hosting is paid. I'm the creator, and I'd appreciate feedback on whether this fits how small teams actually work. Contributions are welcome too. Website and interactive workflow demo: https://claudeshare.space Repo: https://github.com/cyber1443/session-share If you use coding agents with teammates, where do you lose the most time: splitting tickets, avoiding overlapping edits, or integrating the result?   submitted by   /u/Historical_Dinner_69 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：服务器与云资源
  • 分类依据：内容涉及服务器、云资源或网络线路
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/10/16 15:55:12