Original Summary

Agents are here to stay - so slop is too. Unfortunately it&#x27;s easy to vibe a plausible thing for A Show HN, so (some, not all) Show HNs demonstrate only the creator&#x27;s ability to ask agents for a thing. Shipping a first draft (instead of refining it into something only you could&#x27;ve done) forces others to inspect the mess and decide if there&#x27;s any &quot;there&quot; there. It offloads the work of deciding if the work is worthwhile.<p>Badly written README; landing page full of LLMisms; a buggy mess that only works on my box.. all signs of lack of the love and craft to which the hacker ethos aspires..<p>So - can we raise the bar?<p>The Show HN guidelines (https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;showhn.html) cover most of this so maybe people just need to be gently redirected &#x2F; more enforcement is needed ...<p>But! What if Show HN submissions require the submitter to provide &quot;proof-of-work&quot;, ie. here&#x27;s how this goes beyond just prompting; here&#x27;s a little behind-the-scenes, if you will. Something a person has to hand-write that proves their thing is worth checking out.<p>Or something else? But it&#x27;d be great to lift the quality of Show HNs


  • 情报分类:商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据:内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源:Hacker News 新项目
  • 发布时间:2026/10/12 09:03:56