Original Summary

I’ve been building TickerWorth (tickerworth.com) on my own and would really like honest feedback. The problem I kept hitting: most stock sites give you a fair value or price target as one number. You can’t see the growth rate, the discount rate, or which filing the revenue came from, so you can’t tell whether it’s any good. What it does: Type a ticker and you get a fair value, the (delayed) price, and every input with its source: the 10-K line, the FRED series for the risk-free rate, or “ESTIMATE” with the reasoning written out A reverse DCF: the growth rate today’s price already implies A 0–100 score for the business When a DCF is the wrong tool (banks, insurers, REITs, utilities) or the filings are too thin, the page says so instead of forcing a number 130 companies are researched by hand from filings; the rest are modelled automatically, and every page says which one you’re looking at. Every covered company is free to read, no ads. Pro ($14.99/mo) adds the editable model and a workbook download. What I’d love feedback on: does a page make sense if you’ve never built a DCF? And what would make you come back to it?   submitted by   /u/TickerWorth [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据：内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/10/9 12:15:36