Original Summary

I'm Faheem, a paramedic in Singapore. I built OnTheRice because I was frustrated with market commentary that skips the source chain. Here's what I noticed: most market analysis reads a few headlines and makes a call. But they never show you—what was the exact original source? When was it published? What changed since then? OnTheRice does the opposite. Every day I search headlines across 24 languages. Not because I'm smarter than anyone else—because if something is moving the world, it shows up in the original language before it gets summarized into English. Then I verify each source: where did this come from, who published it, is it still current, does it connect to today's actual market pulse? Only the strongest connected stories make it to The Daily Editorial. That story is broken into three parts: What Changed (the actual signal), Why It Matters (who gets hit), and What Happens Next (the number to watch, not another warning). Here's what's different: I keep the record open. The sources are linked. The graphs show the connections. And if I miss or get it wrong, that stays in the archive. No deleting it later. Read it at new.ontherice.org. Also on Google Play. No paywall. Genuine question for this sub: what would make you trust a market signal more—a system that shows you the work, or one that just tells you the answer?   submitted by   /u/Difficult-Angle-4715 [link]   [comments]

中文概览

中文标题： OnTheRice：阅读24种语言提前捕捉市场信号

新加坡急救员Faheem开发了OnTheRice，每天搜索24种语言的新闻标题，在大事被总结成英文前捕捉原始来源，并逐一核实出处、发布时间和时效性，筛选出关联最强的故事进入每日社论。内容分为信号变化、影响对象和后续关注指标三部分，公开所有来源链接，错误记录保留存档不删除，无付费墙，另有Google Play应用。

  • 情报分类：开源项目与落地
  • 分类依据：作者介绍自建多语言市场信号平台
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/13 10:06:31