A few months ago I set out to automate my inbox and calendar with AI. The obvious approach — let the AI read email, draft a reply, and send it — turned out to be the wrong one. Here's what actually mattered: The approval gate is the actual product, not the AI. Anyone can wire up an LLM to draft an email. The value is in the workflow around it — a strict human checkpoint before anything goes out, and a full audit trail of what was drafted, approved, or rejected. Multi-channel matters more than I expected. I originally built this as a web dashboard. The moment I added a Telegram bot so I could approve things from my phone without opening a laptop, actual daily usage went up a lot. People don't want another tab, they want it where they already are. Generic AI drafts feel obviously rob

  • 情报分类：技术价值、项目价值
  • 命中依据：AI邮件草稿助手经验，涉及AI产品设计
  • 来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 原作者：/u/jenish__bhesaniya https://www.reddit.com/user/jenish__bhesaniya
  • 发布时间：2026/9/12 12:56:11