Original Summary

I’ve been building NASAEmployees.com as a side project for people who enjoy space history and engineering. It has illustrated breakdowns of Curiosity and its Sky Crane, speculative concept studies (clearly labeled as such), and a growing collection of case files using public NASA records and my own FOIA correspondence. It’s an independent project, not affiliated with NASA. I’m trying to make the deeper technical pages approachable without blurring the line between documented history and speculation. If you have a minute to look around, what would you improve first: the navigation, the way sources are presented, or the page design? https://www.nasaemployees.com/   submitted by   /u/Patient-Ad-1004 [link]   [comments]

  • 情报分类：硬件与数码
  • 分类依据：内容涉及硬件、数码产品或通信卡
  • 信息来源：Reddit · SideProject
  • 发布时间：2026/9/29 06:24:27