Original Summary

A year ago, I came across Google Notebook LM. I was completely blown away at the time: it wasn&#x27;t just a ChatGPT-style conversation, but rather introduced an &quot;input—conversation—output&quot; model, turning itself into a workspace for content creators. However, to use it smoothly required a Google subscription, and I really didn&#x27;t have spare money in my wallet to subscribe, so I could only consider finding some self-hosted alternatives.<p>I saw many open-source versions of Notebook LM on GitHub, the most famous being lfnovo&#x2F;open-notebook, but it requires Docker deployment. To be honest, I hate that everything requires Docker deployment. What I need is to click an icon and open it for use, rather than racking my brains to modify someone else&#x27;s Docker Compose template to run a simple piece of software, while also consuming a large amount of my computer resources.<p>So I wrote a Notebook LM-inspired client based on Electron myself: KnowNote. I published it on X, and the response seemed pretty good. My repository&#x27;s star count soared. This was my first open-source project, and it excited me immensely. I developed all the fancy features by following Notebook LM&#x27;s functionality exactly—mind maps, flashcards, quizzes, and so on—hoping to truly bring Notebook LM locally.<p>But later everything began to change. Many comments under my X posts said: &quot;Isn&#x27;t this just reinventing the wheel?&quot;; the GitHub star count stopped growing; a large number of boring and low-quality PRs flooded the entire repository. I was at a loss all of a sudden, became lazy, and the repository stopped being updated for nearly a year.<p>Recently, I calmed my mindset and truly began to look at the problem from a product manager&#x27;s perspective. I went through many discussions on Reddit and X about Notebook LM and its derivatives, and found that everyone&#x27;s mindset and the topics they focused on had also begun to shift: at first everyone was praising how excellent Notebook LM was, but now they were discussing &quot;What do you actually use NotebookLM for?&quot; &quot;What&#x27;s the difference between it and just throwing files to ChatGPT &#x2F; Gemini?&quot; &quot;How can plugins, tools, and other products make it better to use?&quot;<p>I realized that even Notebook LM cannot satisfy all users&#x27; needs. Merely copying it completely will only lead me down its old path. I increasingly feel that KnowNote should not chase after NotebookLM&#x27;s feature list. I collected the questions everyone cared about most and found that most discussions revolved around this one core issue:<p>When you find an answer from a large amount of material through AI, how do you make that process more accurate, more transparent, and more comfortable?<p>It dawned on me that what I should truly solve well is this most core user problem, rather than drifting with the crowd.<p>In the past few days, I redesigned KnowNote&#x27;s future roadmap, refocusing on AI Q&amp;A, information retrieval, source citation, and the interactive experience built around these capabilities, using AI for reconstruction. Now I have released version v1.5.0, and I am very happy to reintroduce this project to everyone. Although many things may still not be easy to use, and I myself don&#x27;t even have answers for many directions, I actually hope even more that more people will come in and give it a try right now. If you have used NotebookLM, Obsidian, various AI knowledge bases, or RAG tools, I especially want to know: What is the most frustrating thing for you when using these products or is there any need you have always wanted but existing products have never solved well?<p>If you are willing, you can try KnowNote, and you are also welcome to directly submit Issues, complain, or tell me that this direction simply doesn&#x27;t hold up. Now I want to treat it more as a project that slowly seeks answers together with the community.<p>GitHub: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mrsibe&#x2F;KnowNote" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mrsibe&#x2F;KnowNote</a>


  • 情报分类:商业与市场研究
  • 分类依据:内容涉及商业、投资或市场动态
  • 信息来源:Hacker News 新项目
  • 发布时间:2026/9/28 23:54:55